Disclaimer: This is a BLOG entry. If you want short, 160 character entries, check Twitter.
Anybody who’s talked to me knows I was a big supporter of Steve Harvey’s book and talks about it. I have come out in jubilant support of his book (which you already know the name of and is plagiarized anyway), and I encouraged any conversation that anybody wanted to have about it (especially since relationships are one of my favorite topics of discussion). The boom from everything that I read and the input and output that women would give me was just wonderful. Long live the Steve…
Then….inertia set in and the initial whoop-de-whoo high of the book wore off, and I was able to read the book again for what it was, which was NOT as good of a final product as I initially thought. Do I think it’s a waste of money? No. Do I still agree with half of the book? Yes. However, I think that there are some enthymemes in there that really paint people in a very unfavorable light. First of all, a woman can only act and think like herself. Giving off a title like this will, at most, lead women to apply THEIR thought process to the male thought process, which will NEVER align. Also, both men and women are put into seemingly lumped categories that seem to be the basis of his sage advice, which is that women are humans attached to a vagina and men are hungry wolves who are ALWAYS out to devour said genitals. Not only is this NOT TRUE (in all cases), but I believe that the women who find themselves stapled to this book and making Steve’s word GOSPEL (to the point where some have wanted to bring the book with them on dates) will not only misinterpret men, but they will misvalue themselves.
I was asked one time “what is one thing you wish you could change about women?”, to which I replied “women need to value THEMSELVES over their vagina”. Too many people tell women that they should value their vagina, which is good advice, but often times, it seems as though GIRLS are being told that their vagina is the best and rarest and most precious thing about them. The problem is twofold: that a vagina is common amongst ALL females and it undermines treasuring her personality, time, mind, spirit, etc. Too often do I see women willing to whore out their emotions, money, spirit, personality, and happiness (being content with getting little in return) while putting a Fort Knox fortress around their vagina, putting a HEFTY price tag on their sex. I know of many women literally allowing themselves to be BOUGHT like commodities to the highest bidder, enforcing a “cash for ass” quid pro quo reciprocation. Last time I checked, that was prostitution. Tell a woman that, you better protect your neck.
Steve (who uses the safety blanket of “I’m not an expert on women”, even though there are chapters (even a whole section) in the book telling women how to get what they want) plays right into this concept. Women, you’re a coochie with a body attached. Lines like “from the minute a man sees you across a room, he has a plan for you” are complete poppycock. If I’m walking down the street and I see you and I want to approach you, all I see is a smile or some eyes or a face or whatever. A man who makes a plan without knowing what he’s dealing with is a fool. To believe that is to say that men think with their eyes and can come to a conclusion without giving their mind a valid chance to give them the whole picture. While there are men who ARE like that, all men (especially GOOD men) don’t do this.Empty shells of women exist everywhere, and the negatives to falling slave to these women can sometimes outweigh whatever physical gain you can celebrate by having them in your life.
His preached tactic of “hold your vagaina back from him/hold it over his head like a carrot in front of a donkey” will cause more trauma and headache, because the main thing is that women will go into relationships with the wrong armor on and will be shielding one thing, while allowing everything else to come to ruin. Steve says that most of his inspiration for the book comes from the Strawberry Letter segment of his morning show. Being an avid listener of this segment, I believe most of the problems come from a lack of emotional control. Yes, having sex changes things, but there are more instances of a woman writing because she fell for a man emotionally than physically being swept up into a whirlwind. Women are emotional creatures, so giving all t his literary praise to the cooter love will only create a new set of problems.
This brings me to one of his shining graces and “signature” principles (which has already been brought up in books dating back to 1998): the famous “90 day” rule. According to Mr. Harvey, holding out on the vaginations for 90 days will help you to sift out a lot of your problems, citing the 90 day probationary period that Ford Motor Company puts on their employees before any benefits (like insurance) are given. In a clip of him promoting the book on Tyra Show, he says the following:
“Why is it that women, who possess the greatest benefit of them all: yo lovin’, yo time, yo sexiness, yo company, yo body, al…the GREATEST benefit to man. There ain’t a man livin’ that ain’t got to have those things, but you passin’ out BENEFITS before 90 days, YOU DON’T EVEN KNOW THIS DUDE!!!”
This is the biggest crock in the book, because in its essence, it’s enforcing the idea that the best thing you can be to a man is a piece of meat. Note all the things he said are the same things that an escort or call girl can bring to the table. It puts NO emphasis on her emotions or her passion or her spirit or her brain, which are all things that can ENHANCE the points that Steve listed. Yes, men are tactile, but how in the world does that give way to allow women to sit themselves aside so that they can (using Steve’s 3 P’s in reference to women) profess, protect, and provide something that they share in common with ALL other females? To me, this only feeds into the problem that women have about “well, I better not hold out on the sex, because if I do, he’ll just go get it from someone who will just give it up quicker.” Men treasure things that we have to work for. If we feel that we can get EVERYTHING but the sex up front with no need to meet any of the woman’s “standards and requirements”, the minute we’re suddenly required to EARN the cookie, it doesn’t make sense. Then, we look at it from the pure tactile point of view of “I’m getting everything BUT sex from this woman that I’m not committed to, so let me go get sex from other women”. Wham, bam, thank you, ma’am, and we’re back to you. So, while you’re 90 day’ing, he could be out there playing.
Another thing that makes this 90 Day Rule not make any sense are when people like me, who haven’t had intercourse in some time (as of today, I’m at 8 years, 6 months, and 24 days). The 90 Day Rule incorrectly lumps me in as a sex hound, and would lead the woman to protect herself from a war that I’m not waging. To have this book promote me as someone who needs coddling, ego fellatio, and booty (support, loyalty, and the cookie) is outright insulting, and completely downplays and oversimplifies what I want as an ORIGINAL man. Just as every woman’s desires are unique, so are every man’s. No woman likes being given a script and treated like any other woman out there, so I really don’t agree with him giving this script that will not only skew the minds of the readers, but can lead them deeper into the pit of “saying what you want to hear” (I PROMISE you, the players have read the book and have already crafted loopholes through EVERY point he brought up. Women aren’t the ONLY ones reading this BEST SELLER, I guarantee!)
This “expert on manhood” is adopting an “us vs. them” mentality, whereas all men who agree with me are “good men”, and all the men who have reservations about the points I present are “one of them”. Reading Robert Greene’s “The 48 Laws of Power”, there is a chapter about playing on people’s need to believe in order to create a cult following that I think fully applies here. He’s praised himself on his show, talking about how no man has been able to come and refute anything that he’s said in the book. To that, I say Steve, if a man could poke holes in your book’s theories, would you give him the same public forum that you give your supporters? Would you concede and admit that you DID miss a point? I am willing to bet that he wouldn’t, or he would QUICKLY shrug them off and use his platform and status to crush the man. Of course, any WOMAN who attacks his theories will get deflected with the “I’m an expert on MEN and how MEN think” safety blanket. He’s made it a POINT to constantly insert safety blankets in the media, because of course, the book will begin to look like the flat emotional pander that it is. He once spoke about how he never expected the book to take off like this, but I promise you, he’s riding this bad boy to the end. Congrats to a man who’s once…twice…three times a husband.
-B